Non-pvp town's raiding on Pvp-Side

I propose that we try to fix the supposed Non-PvP People raiding PvP. We should make it so that in order to attack PvP towns they must be in a PvP town.

Please Post thoughts and Spread the word

Max's thoughts...
There is definite problem of peaceful towns taking advantage of PvP being absent on the North side of the map by attacking PvP towns knowing there will not be any retaliation since they simply can't be attacked when on the North side.

I am sure this can be very frustrating for PvP towns that get attacked all the time, but can't attack back their attackers. I think the issue will only get worse too judging by the amount of peaceful towns vs PvP towns.

What I propose
I say we make it so that if you live in a peaceful town you are NOT allowed to go and attack any PvP towns. I think this is fair because if you chose to live on the peaceful side you are probably not too much into PvP, and if all the sudden you want to fight, you can always challenge someone in the coliseum.

If you say you live on the peaceful side, but are heavily into PvP, I don't believe you, and if you really are, then the only reason you live on the peaceful side is to take advantage of the situation. Well in that case, too bad

Thoughts? Suggestions?

 

i concur

 

Yeah something like that would be great

 

There is that better?

 

I remember 2-3 months ago i talked to blatca about this and we both agreed if you live in the non-pvp zone you should not be able to pvp except warhub and coliseum

 

Yeah but it needs to be enforced cause I see people like UKSaint and Colonel Nietches and Flood and such out raiding.

 

i thought UK and Colonel were on the pvp side

 

OH wait UK is in arcadia.

 

Shows how good your intelligence is, we have our own town on pvp side

We did admittedly start pvping from the peaceful side but that was before we understood how the server worked... literally the first week. When we started our pvp town my name was still yellow.

PS Good effort at spelling my name Korean

 

great idea should definitely do it.

 

It is cool Though it does getting annoying that people do pvp from non pvp.

 

North_Korean is very right its very cheap for somone to live in the non-pvp and come attack then go back to there home in the non-PvP and the person who was killed will not have a chance to get there stuff back which will really sucks

 

Well that sucks

I just got into pvping and raids, but am not even close to leaving FC

 

I would agree it does get annoying. But at the same time it offers a challenge of wild card players. like roving bandits.

Pad's also right. For long term players thats gunna mess them up a bit, and I don't think it'd be fair to have some people be exempt from the rule.

On a semi-related note: I think this would also encourage more pvp towns to start up. Because they will have to choose between fighting players or basically just building.

 

I like the idea of more towns springing up maybe Arcadia can love us again

 

Hmm maybe you can turn each side into a nation like pvp and non pvp and have them go at it if we can get both sides to vote enough and agree but that is a long shot.
Maybe also add a class Loner for people who just wanna live in there own home by them selves away from towns and kinda have it just understood kinda just avoid them.

 

Double post ^

Unrelated: Is that freemans mind in your sig? and arcadia doesn't hate :3 Just feel its smarter that we don't ally.

 

It's too bad there isn't a way to "tag" a non pvper if they attack a pvp town, that way even if they do go to the non-pvp a Tagged player can still be hunted

I don't know what are option are for fixing this problem other the making a rule thatany non pvp town member cannot attack a pvp town with mods being the enforcers

 

It is freemans mind !!! ^_^

 

I agree with a lot of the points here. It is a little unfair when non-pvp people can just raid a pvp town and face no repercussions of a counter-attack.

I have some questions too. How would this be implemented and/or enforced?