Trust Exercises in PvP

I feel sorry for you Ginger.. All you proposed is a simple mob arena type event where two enemies sort out their differences battling hordes of zombies/mobs. This is just sad how so many people attack you, and say mean things about your simple proposal.

Just wow :/

 

Thx bkoch, at least u understand


Sent from the SwanPhone

No, I said ENEMIES have to TRUST each other, and accidental hits are ok.



Sent from the SwanPhone

 

Looks like im going to lose 10k

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2

 

Can't we just do MobArena (Assuming we still have that)?

 

You could do that (if it's still here) but the reason why he made this entire thing. Was to settle differences in PvP, not really for the mob arena idea.

 

If you wanna settle your differences in pvp I say you should have a straight fight to the death.

 

Thunderdome! Two may enter... One may leave!

 

This thread is still alive? -____-

 

I don't post much, but this is the dumbest idea I've seen in a long time. If you want to fight mobs, just go pve. If you want to fight players, run into pvp. I don't even, I odd.

 

If you don't like receiving criticism, then you shouldn't be on the internet. There are critics everywhere.

 

I can kinda see where you were trying to go with this.

But maybe it should just be that two players are stuck in the mob arena until one of them dies. I'm not sure how ti would work, but whomever dies first from a player, then they "win" (As in, they were betrayed by the other player). Maybe it could be that death from a mob respawns them in the arena again?

 

What if both players start with a fixed amount of diamonds. They place as many as they choose into a chest so the opponent doesn't know how many they put in the chest and how many they are holding. First to strike gets what both players are holding with the other player getting what both placed in the chests. If after a set time nobody has attacked then each player keeps what they have in inventory plus the amount the other player placed in the chest.

I'm not sure what it says about trust but it makes for a weird trust strategy game.

 

This is fundamentally flawed.

There is simply no need for a trust exercise, especially one for two enemies. I guess it's cool that you have this idea ginger, but it's just not happening. Maybe if someone wants to build rapport with someone, that person should just be trustworthy and loyal to whatever cause that the two players are fighting for. Finding the chemistry that makes two people trust each other comes through real experience.

As a Pvp council member, I'm going to nay this proposal. It's great that you have ideas, and never hesitate to post them, but this one is just a hassle for anybody who would be involved in making it. That is my final word on this matter.

 

That would not totally settle the differences, seeing as though one person loses their gear



Sent from the SwanPhone